#76
|
||||
|
||||
I would have responded before, but my WiFi modem failed last week, and I am now back on line.
Almost all surviving Jaguars are in decent condition, as all the old rust heaps have long gone to the scrapyard. The mechanics are reasonably straight forward, and most parts that need replacing due to wear and tear aren't that expensive. (Under British Leyland control, some parts came from the corporate parts bin, eg, I had to replace the steering rack on my 1984 XJ6 and it was the same part used on other BL models such as the Marina!) The most expensive work needed is on an engine rebuild. All XK engines leak oil, some more than others, and eventually the crankshaft seals have to be replaced, which means the engine comes out. Owners will usually get a full rebuild at that stage, as the engine will probably have done well in excess of 100,000 miles. If you look after all the fluid levels and use the correct old style anti freeze, the engines will go on for many thousands of miles. The most frustrating aspect of XJ6 ownership is the notoriously flaky air conditioning systems, They all leak, and eventually need replacing with reconditioned units. But all that is forgotten when you fire one up and take it out on the road. There aren't many modern cars that give the same quality of ride and performance. Cheers, |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Would have met the criteria for a fantasy car from the past but unfortunately a bit past the Gaffa Tape repair, the two occupants got out and the only thing left to identify the make of car was the lettering on the brakes.
|
#78
|
||||
|
||||
Bit of Tcut and some filler... no, perhaps too much.
Great day for Heywood, and I'm very glad those involved were OK>
__________________
Buvez toujours, mourrez jamais. Rabelais |
#80
|
||||
|
||||
Should have bought a Volvo, ... that way you get a bill from the Forestry Commission for their tree .... ...
__________________
"I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure." Corporal Hicks (Actually Ripley said it first.) |
#81
|
||||
|
||||
Tyres need to be carefully chosen. These should do.
__________________
Buvez toujours, mourrez jamais. Rabelais |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
farmer john#36
yes I can imagine. The P5 B sedan and the P5B Coupe were identical up to the glass. From there the windscreens and door glass are different and the coupe model sits about three inches below the sedan. A lot of people think that the word coupe means two door. Not so, the word coupe is French for chop or cut which accounts for the lower roof line on the model. One of the nicest, IMO coupes is the jags from around the mid sixties.
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
The Ford GT40.
One car that must fit-the-bill on here is Fords GT40. There has been so much written about these cars full details can be got off the interweb. Briefly, the GT40 was conceived, in the eary '60s, as an endurance racer designed to win such races as LeMans and Daytona24hrs, etc., and be Fords attempt to beat Ferrari. I had the book...'The Ford that Beat Ferrari,' which was a complete history including each car by chassis No.
The project started when H.Ford 2 wanted to buy the Ferrari make and have an American car win LeMans. The buying process fell through, which left HF. determined to build such a car. To cut a long story short, the project was a joint British/American effort, base on the Lola sports/racing car Mk6 chassis. Carol Shelby and John Wyer(Br. formerly of Aston Martin) led the project and formed Ford Advanced Vehicles Ltd. (FAV). There is more I'd like to say on this later but just now (literally!!) the post has delivered me a copy of that book mentioned above!!! A present from Mrs JJ, obtained off Amazon for an undisclosed sum, for our wedding anniversary (55) on Friday. My original copy was bought for me, again, by my wife when they first came out in 1985. That one was sold at Sotherbys, Chester at the peak of their value in 2005. I regretted that. JJ. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
The Ford GT40.
Following on from my previous post....Wow, that book...it really was a surprise!!
Anyway, the GT40 got it's name from it being only 40 inches high. The original project was called just 'Ford GT' but as it materialised the '40' was added'. The cars were built in Britain, as we had the expertise in building sports/racing cars at that time, and a good base for the European races. with some shipped to the USA for races there. All the Mk2s went to the USA to be modified by Shelby and Holman & Moody, who were well known constructors of cars for NASCAR. The engine in the Lola was Ford's 260cu.in.V8, modified for racing but in the new car it was found to be unreliable so the 289 (4.7ltr) was used, progressing through the development to the 302 (5.0ltr) and, in the Mk2 version, the 427(7ltr) motor from the racing Galaxie. All push-rod with cast iron heads. In 1966, Henry realised his ambition to beat Ferrari at LeMans, with GT40's taking the first 3 places. They went on to win in '67,'68 and '69. During the production of these cars, it was decided to build some road cars as well which were suitably modified and had quad headlamps instead of the square. It was certainly my fantasy car in the late '60s/'70s but way far out of reach. Later they were selling to collectors for £millions. Many replica kit cars and fully built replicas started being produced but even these are very expensive. In 2005, Ford produced a new GT road car styled almost exactly like the '40 as a limited edition which is now a collectable supercar. Back in 1969, I was driving through Much Wenlock in Shropshire when behind me came an orange GT40, the only original one I've ever seen on the road. It turned out to be owned by a lady from that town. The same car was at Oulton Park circuit when we were there a few years later. I got talking to her and got a real good look round the car - it was a race car(4.7ltr, chassis 1073), but road registered as many were. JJ. |
#85
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I see now that there are replicas on offer, but they are even more out of my reach now that the original was then. Apart from anything else, since the Green party (upon whose heads may blessings fall!) here in Ireland introduced a new motor tax regime based upon CO2 emissions, my 2 lite Mondeo costs me €750 a year in motor tax. What would I have to pay the tree huggers for a 4.7 litre GT40? |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Hi Art, nice to see you on here. I always thought that I would buy a cheap kit and build one but you are so right - even the crappiest ones from way back are too expensive now. Back in 2012, I had a '93 Ford Thunderbird with the 5.0ltr engine, which I would have used as a base car if I could find a body/chassis, but no luck. The original GT40s were selling in 1966 for around £5K brand new, and they had a job to sell all their road cars. Now virtually priceless!! I think a firm called GTD(?) in South Africa bought all the jigs and stuff. They will build one with authenticated chassis Nos. following on, for an enormous price, if I'm thinking of the right company. Mind you, not really a daily driver - I think we would miss our creature comforts....... JJ. |
#87
|
||||
|
||||
We had a light blue version of this back in the 50's. Always thought it was a lovely car. Very well finished and fitted for the era. Now seeing them - on the odd occasion - they were certainly very small. Made with an aluminium body. I also liked its big brother - the Renown.
Neville |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
One of my aunts had a Mayflower and it certainly seemed very 'posh' to me as a 10/11 year old. She didn't drive but my two cousins (17 and 18yo) used it to run her about. My uncle was away most of the time at sea and didn't drive either. The Mayflower and the Triumph Renown's were styled in the 'razor edge' look and quite limousine like. JJ. |
#89
|
||||
|
||||
Seen today in Northampton.....
.. was not a Fantasy Car from the Past, nor was it a fantastic car from the past, but it was one of those that was a best seller in it's day. A British Leyland legend. A Mark 1 Morris Marina. In classic 1970's desert sand yellow brown, with a few rust patches in the usual places, (everywhere,) brown interior, and no hub caps. There was one subtle modification though. The current owner obviously has trouble with the bonnet catch, and has cured the problem with some strategically placed strips of silver gaffer tape.
|
#90
|
||||
|
||||
In Devon it would have been baler twine
__________________
The Mad Landsman |
#92
|
||||
|
||||
They must have been looking over the shoulder of this mob.
http://www.carstyling.ru/en/entry/Bu...0/images/2951/ Designed by the bloke who did the R100.
__________________
Buvez toujours, mourrez jamais. Rabelais Last edited by Farmer John; 9th August 2017 at 23:00. |
#93
|
||||
|
||||
Buckminster Fuller designed the "Dymaxion" car in 1933.. Strange looking machine, but very modern for its time.
http://www.washedashore.com/projects.../pictures.html |
#94
|
||||
|
||||
I would worry about a 3 wheel car that was intended to do 120 mph and carry 11 people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1yxFDvqALI
__________________
Buvez toujours, mourrez jamais. Rabelais Last edited by Farmer John; 10th August 2017 at 23:18. |
#95
|
||||
|
||||
Daimler Petrol Driven Reitwagen - Replica
In 1882 Daimler set up a workshop in Connstatt near Stuttgart where he made internal combustion engines. Together with Wilhelm Maybach he produced small, transportable, petrol driven single cylinder engines. To test the engine’s performance Daimler and Maybach installed it in a two-wheeled wooden framed affair in 1885. In November that year they took their Reitwagon on a 3 km test on the road between Connstatt and Untertürkheim. Liquid cooled, 4 stroke petrol engine, 90 kg, 12 km/h, 264 cc, 8 litres/100 km Dresden Technical Museum 15 July 2107 Last edited by YM-Mundrabilla; 11th August 2017 at 01:55. |
#96
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
... and this is now 27 years old, so moving toward a classic.
__________________
"I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure." Corporal Hicks (Actually Ripley said it first.) |
#97
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Wouldn't want to get my wet weather gear or anything else for that matter caught up in the back wheel however.............. |
#98
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah ... that does look a bit like a leg mangler ..
__________________
"I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure." Corporal Hicks (Actually Ripley said it first.) |
#99
|
||||
|
||||
If you used it to just go down the shops, that would be an awesome mount. If it caught fire, you wouldn't have much left.
I would love one for a short distance runabout, though I suspect it would need a very extensive toolbox to maintain all of it.
__________________
Buvez toujours, mourrez jamais. Rabelais |
Post Reply |
|
|