Go Back   Shipping History > Shipping Discussion > Ships, Shipping & Maritime Interests > Tankers

Grace 1

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 5th July 2019, 07:44
BobClay's Avatar
BobClay United Kingdom BobClay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Cornwall UK
Posts: 1,530
Images: 73
Grace 1

I'm clearly out of touch with shipping routes from the Gulf. On the news they described the route of the tanker fully loaded from Iran as 'taking the long route around the Cape of Good Hope instead of going through the Suez Canal.'

I'm just curious because I did that route a number of times, because a tanker of that size fully loaded was just too big for Suez. Have they improved the canal that much since my day ? … if so … fair enough.

Appreciate any info about what Suez can take these days.
__________________
"I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
Corporal Hicks
(Actually Ripley said it first.)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 5th July 2019, 08:00
Tony Selman's Avatar
Tony Selman United Kingdom Tony Selman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: near Folkestone, Kent
Posts: 426
Images: 17
Bob, I transited Suez Northbound a few years ago on a cruise and I asked a similar question. From memory I think the max draft is in the region of 65 feet and the max beam about 165 feet, there is no restriction on length as far as I can remember. I sailed on a VLCC with very similar dimensions in the early 70s and she was 215,000 dwt so that might give you a clue.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 5th July 2019, 08:13
BobClay's Avatar
BobClay United Kingdom BobClay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Cornwall UK
Posts: 1,530
Images: 73
Was that fully loaded ? I knew VLCC's could go through unloaded, but the draft was too much fully loaded. I'd say at 65 feet you'd be pushing your luck.

If I remember correctly my first VLCC, the Hudson Friendship was pulling 64 feet, and the Old Man chose to go to Japan from the Gulf via the Lombok Strait rather than chance the Malacca.
__________________
"I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
Corporal Hicks
(Actually Ripley said it first.)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 5th July 2019, 08:26
erimus's Avatar
erimus United Kingdom erimus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 339
She went the long way round taking weeks which is why there was suspicion.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 5th July 2019, 08:29
BobClay's Avatar
BobClay United Kingdom BobClay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Cornwall UK
Posts: 1,530
Images: 73
So you're saying she could have gone through Suez fully loaded, but didn't ?

OK that would make the News statement sensible.

Suez has changed a bit since I last went through it … (close to 40 years ago.)
__________________
"I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
Corporal Hicks
(Actually Ripley said it first.)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 5th July 2019, 09:57
Ron Stringer's Avatar
Ron Stringer England Ron Stringer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 250
http://maritime-connector.com/wiki/suezmax/


May be of help.
__________________
Ron

__________________________________________________ _________________________
Never regret growing older. It is a privilege denied to many. Don't worry about old age - it doesn't last.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 5th July 2019, 10:10
BobClay's Avatar
BobClay United Kingdom BobClay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Cornwall UK
Posts: 1,530
Images: 73
Thanks Ron. I'm still a bit confused because it that ship is fully loaded, she can't get through Suez, and would have to go around the Cape.

My reading is she has a 22m draft and goes over 300,000 dwt. She looks fully loaded in what pix I can see.

Clearly there's some politics going on here, but the news report as far as I can see was misleading.
__________________
"I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
Corporal Hicks
(Actually Ripley said it first.)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 5th July 2019, 10:15
Varley's Avatar
Varley Isle of Man Varley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Isle of Man, G.B.
Posts: 2,404
I suspect it would take rather more cartons and bottles to get through Suez than is customary were she to be on a sanctions black-list.
__________________
David V
Lord Finchley tried to mend the electric light
Himself. It struck him dead and serve him right
It is the duty of the wealthy man
To give employment to the artisan
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 5th July 2019, 16:09
erimus's Avatar
erimus United Kingdom erimus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 339
Bob, see if you can download the Financial Times article of yesterday...tells you a lot.

geoff
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 5th July 2019, 19:04
BobClay's Avatar
BobClay United Kingdom BobClay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Cornwall UK
Posts: 1,530
Images: 73
I have read that. I'm not particularly bothered by the politics or reasons of this event, I just wanted to understand the report that the ship raised suspicions and was tracked after it took the long way round instead of going through the Suez Canal. That's how they stated it on TV News.

At first I thought: 'Has that canal been modified so much it can take a tanker of that size fully loaded ?' I now realise it hasn't.

That's a larger ship than any VLCC I sailed on, and I sailed on a few.

I'll put it down to journalism. Perhaps they look at the map and don't understand why a ship would take the long way round. (And it is a long long way when you consider how far Syria is from Iran.) I still don't think they fully understand the sheer size of these vessels.

She's still being plotted on the Marine Traffic Site.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Grace1.jpg (60.4 KB, 15 views)
__________________
"I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
Corporal Hicks
(Actually Ripley said it first.)

Last edited by BobClay; 5th July 2019 at 19:08.
Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.